Difference between revisions of "InRole"
From SmartWiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | '''@ | + | '''@object.inRole(Rolename)@''' |
− | There are three things to use caution about this | + | This syntax can be used on [[submit logic]], [[visibility condition]], [[browser script]] or any other role specific validation. It will always return a value, either true or false. |
+ | |||
+ | There are three things to use caution about this syntax. | ||
*'''Case Sensitive''' – Watch for lower case “i” and upper case “R” | *'''Case Sensitive''' – Watch for lower case “i” and upper case “R” | ||
Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
'''Correct''': '''@me.inRole(Organization Contact)@''' | '''Correct''': '''@me.inRole(Organization Contact)@''' | ||
− | '''Wrong''': “@ | + | '''Wrong''': “@owner.inRole(Organization Contact)@” |
'''Wrong''': @me.inRole(“Organization Contact”)@ | '''Wrong''': @me.inRole(“Organization Contact”)@ |
Revision as of 14:54, 18 September 2012
@object.inRole(Rolename)@
This syntax can be used on submit logic, visibility condition, browser script or any other role specific validation. It will always return a value, either true or false.
There are three things to use caution about this syntax.
- Case Sensitive – Watch for lower case “i” and upper case “R”
- Do not encapsulate the whole syntax – This syntax always returns a value, either true or false which mostly would not cause any problems for example in sslogic or visibility conditions. However encapsulation of the syntax would basically return a string which is useless if not equalled to another string.
- Do not encapsulate the role name – This I believe is looping the role names in the instance and tries to match what is in the brackets. Use the exact role name without encapsulating.
Correct: @me.inRole(Organization Contact)@
Wrong: “@owner.inRole(Organization Contact)@”
Wrong: @me.inRole(“Organization Contact”)@
Wrong: “@me.inRole(“Organization Contact”)@”
Wrong: @me.InRole(Organization Contact)@ OR @me.inrole(Organization Contact)@